2004-02-19

Feminism as anti-anti-Semitism

In response to Veil of Tears:
Whatever happened to Arab feminism?
,
let me make an observation which should be far better known:

Feminism, in its post-1963 phase,
is primarily an anti-anti-Semitic strategy,
created, promoted, and often led by Jews
to reduce and/or eliminate the potential
for anti-Semitism in various societies.


Background for this assertion:

It is now quite clear how the Jews responded to
the cataclysmic (for them) event of the Holocaust.
We all know they firmly resolved "Never Again,"
and that the most obvious manifestation of their resolve
was the establishment of the Jewish state, Israel.

But their braintrust didn't consider that enough,
for harmful anti-Semitic pogroms
might still arise in individual nation-states,
harming local Jewish interests.
As part of their "lessons learned" process,
their braintrust analyzed the nature of
the German society in which the Holocaust originated,
and decided that anything which they could correlate to
what they considered the "disease" of anti-Semitism
must be eradicated from the face of the earth,
if at all possible.
In particular, the Nazi state was
patriarchal (sexist), racist and homophobic
as well as being strongly anti-Semitic.
Thus, in the minds of Jewish leaders,
all these values must be stamped out.
To just eradicate anti-Semitism would be too risky.

The definition of Political Correctness, as it is used,
can practically be equated to
the antithesis, the direct opposite, of Nazism.
I.e., Political Correctness,
as the Jews (and thus most of the left) use the term,
may very well be defined as anti-Nazism.
One sees this equation at work
in the sad case of left-wing advocacy groups
describing (some of) President Bush's judicial nominations
as "Nazis."

An explicit acknowledgement
of this use of feminism as an anti-anti-Semitic tool
appears in Slate in
Iraq's Civil War:
Building civil society in Iraq
is even more important than building democracy.
Here are six new ways to do it.

by Slate's Jewish (naturally) deputy editor
and one-time Washington bureau chief, David Plotz
(who also happens to be husband of the Washington Post's
feminist editorial writer, Hannah Rosen)
(emphasis added):
4. Womanize.
Recent research in economics and social science
suggests that women are a better investment than men.[!]
...
Women's rights groups, women's education,
and all kinds of women's activism
hugely benefit both civil and political society.
Women's involvement tends to moderate political extremism.
Encouraging female-centered civil society groups would help undermine the male-dominated elites
that have done so much damage to Iraq.
Just so,
the Jews since 1963 have used feminism world-wide to
"undermine the male-dominated elites
that have done so much damage to
[Jews throughout the ages]
."

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home